<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Downtime in 2007 for the 20 most popular websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/</link>
	<description>Ramblings and tech news from the Pingdom team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Büyük web sitelerinin downtime süreleri</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-314058</link>
		<dc:creator>Büyük web sitelerinin downtime süreleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-314058</guid>
		<description>[...] göre dünyanın en çok ziyaret edilen 20 web sitesinin downtime sürelerini belirten bir rapor yayınlamış. 2007′nin başlangıcından raporun yayınlandığı Nisan ayına kadarki bu süreler, bahsi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] göre dünyanın en çok ziyaret edilen 20 web sitesinin downtime sürelerini belirten bir rapor yayınlamış. 2007′nin başlangıcından raporun yayınlandığı Nisan ayına kadarki bu süreler, bahsi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo! mai offline nel 2007! - Simone Carletti&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-313111</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo! mai offline nel 2007! - Simone Carletti&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-313111</guid>
		<description>[...] i risultati di una ricerca condotta da Pingdom, nel 2007 Yahoo! ha avuto un uptime del 100%, questo significa che il sito di Yahoo! non è mai [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] i risultati di una ricerca condotta da Pingdom, nel 2007 Yahoo! ha avuto un uptime del 100%, questo significa che il sito di Yahoo! non è mai [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los 20 sitios que más se cayeron - Noticias &#124; Publicación sobre diseño, desarrollo, Internet &#38; tecnología - pixelco.us blog</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-218293</link>
		<dc:creator>Los 20 sitios que más se cayeron - Noticias &#124; Publicación sobre diseño, desarrollo, Internet &#38; tecnología - pixelco.us blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-218293</guid>
		<description>[...] Downtime in 2007 for the 20 most popular websites - Royal pingdown (en inglés) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Downtime in 2007 for the 20 most popular websites &#8211; Royal pingdown (en inglés) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzah 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are we there yet? I don&#8217;t think so</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-176279</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzah 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are we there yet? I don&#8217;t think so</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-176279</guid>
		<description>[...] technology is just not there. Take for example a recent report that demonstrated that only 3 of top 20 most popular web sites achieved the mythical 5 9&#8217;s of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology is just not there. Take for example a recent report that demonstrated that only 3 of top 20 most popular web sites achieved the mythical 5 9&#8217;s of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Quest for Reliability on the Internet - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-166153</link>
		<dc:creator>The Quest for Reliability on the Internet - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-166153</guid>
		<description>[...] planned or unplanned &#8212; as seen by users. According to a report last month by Pingdom, only three of the top 20 most popular web sites achieved this metric in 2007: Yahoo, AOL and Comcast&#8217;s site for high-speed Internet customers (eBay&#8217;s site was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] planned or unplanned &#8212; as seen by users. According to a report last month by Pingdom, only three of the top 20 most popular web sites achieved this metric in 2007: Yahoo, AOL and Comcast&#8217;s site for high-speed Internet customers (eBay&#8217;s site was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search engine futures!: Oddhead Blog: Prediction Markets, Gambling, Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence: David Pennock: Yahoo! Research</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-95745</link>
		<dc:creator>Search engine futures!: Oddhead Blog: Prediction Markets, Gambling, Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence: David Pennock: Yahoo! Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-95745</guid>
		<description>[...] Search engine market share is fluid, so far with Google growing inexorably. However, Microsoft has cash, determination, Internet Explorer, and the willingness to experiment. Ask.com has erasers, 3D, ad budgets, and The Algorithm. Yahoo!, second in market share, often tests equal or better than Google, and new features like Search Assist are impressive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search engine market share is fluid, so far with Google growing inexorably. However, Microsoft has cash, determination, Internet Explorer, and the willingness to experiment. Ask.com has erasers, 3D, ad budgets, and The Algorithm. Yahoo!, second in market share, often tests equal or better than Google, and new features like Search Assist are impressive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alt Search Engines &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Search Engine Futures!</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-69574</link>
		<dc:creator>Alt Search Engines &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Search Engine Futures!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-69574</guid>
		<description>[...] Search engine market share is fluid, so far with Google growing inexorably. However, Microsoft has cash, determination, Internet Explorer, and the willingness to experiment. Ask.com has erasers, 3D, ad budgets, and The Algorithm. Yahoo!, second in market share, often tests equal or better than Google, and new features like Search Assist are impressive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search engine market share is fluid, so far with Google growing inexorably. However, Microsoft has cash, determination, Internet Explorer, and the willingness to experiment. Ask.com has erasers, 3D, ad budgets, and The Algorithm. Yahoo!, second in market share, often tests equal or better than Google, and new features like Search Assist are impressive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dourado.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Grandes sites fora do ar</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-25031</link>
		<dc:creator>dourado.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Grandes sites fora do ar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-25031</guid>
		<description>[...] Você acha que tempo é dinheiro? imagina então para uma grande empresa de internet, qual o prejuizo de alguns segundos fora do ar? Pois é, você que achava que somente o seu site ficava fora do ar, esta enganado. Até os grandes sofrem desse mal, seja por problemas técnicos ou atualizações programadas. O site Royal Pingdom publicou a algumas semanas atrás a lista dos 20 maiores sites da internet em acesso (baseado no Alexa) e o tempo que os mesmos ficaram fora do ar neste ano de 2007. Eu achei muito bom a estabilidade dos sites, pois todos os datacentes trabalham com a margem de 99,9% de uptime, o que dá cerca de 7 horas de downtime por ano, como estamos no meio do ano, os valores abaixo não são tão ruins como parece. Veja: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Você acha que tempo é dinheiro? imagina então para uma grande empresa de internet, qual o prejuizo de alguns segundos fora do ar? Pois é, você que achava que somente o seu site ficava fora do ar, esta enganado. Até os grandes sofrem desse mal, seja por problemas técnicos ou atualizações programadas. O site Royal Pingdom publicou a algumas semanas atrás a lista dos 20 maiores sites da internet em acesso (baseado no Alexa) e o tempo que os mesmos ficaram fora do ar neste ano de 2007. Eu achei muito bom a estabilidade dos sites, pois todos os datacentes trabalham com a margem de 99,9% de uptime, o que dá cerca de 7 horas de downtime por ano, como estamos no meio do ano, os valores abaixo não são tão ruins como parece. Veja: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#35895;&#27468;&#27835;&#21360; Google Blogoscoped &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; &#187; Google当机统计</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-15992</link>
		<dc:creator>&#35895;&#27468;&#27835;&#21360; Google Blogoscoped &#20013;&#25991;&#29256; &#187; Google当机统计</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-15992</guid>
		<description>[...] Pingdom统计了几个流行网站的当机时间，Google这一年当了7分钟 ，根据Nathan Weinberg的计算，当机时间占到0.00540123332% 。Pingdom说雅虎没有当机，但是MSN居然当了2小时45分钟。当然，这是个别观点，在德国，因为域名所有权改变，有几个小时无法访问Google。传说，如果Google当了超过十分钟，宇宙就会爆炸，一切都得重来。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pingdom统计了几个流行网站的当机时间，Google这一年当了7分钟 ，根据Nathan Weinberg的计算，当机时间占到0.00540123332% 。Pingdom说雅虎没有当机，但是MSN居然当了2小时45分钟。当然，这是个别观点，在德国，因为域名所有权改变，有几个小时无法访问Google。传说，如果Google当了超过十分钟，宇宙就会爆炸，一切都得重来。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa top 20 websites downtime in 2007 at Technology News and Tips</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/04/02/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites/comment-page-2/#comment-15126</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexa top 20 websites downtime in 2007 at Technology News and Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=116#comment-15126</guid>
		<description>[...] I didn&#8217;t say that, Pingdom did in a report released recently. In the report, Pingdom lists the top 20 websites ranked by Alexa and their total downtime in 2007. Pingdom is a company who provides uptime and response time monitoring for sites and services on the web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I didn&#8217;t say that, Pingdom did in a report released recently. In the report, Pingdom lists the top 20 websites ranked by Alexa and their total downtime in 2007. Pingdom is a company who provides uptime and response time monitoring for sites and services on the web. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

