<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Downtime in 2007 for the 20 most popular websites &#8211; new numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/</link>
	<description>Ramblings and tech news from the Pingdom team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Site Downtime! Oh no! &#187; DrewAMP.com</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-10180</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Site Downtime! Oh no! &#187; DrewAMP.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 23:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-10180</guid>
		<description>[...] 20 May, 2007&#160; Technology        We recently reported that Yahoo’s main website (www.yahoo.com) has had no downtime at all in 2007. The website appears to be rock solid, and has built up an impressive uptime streak. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20 May, 2007&nbsp; Technology        We recently reported that Yahoo’s main website (www.yahoo.com) has had no downtime at all in 2007. The website appears to be rock solid, and has built up an impressive uptime streak. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogger.com - downtime champion : TrendPlex</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9974</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogger.com - downtime champion : TrendPlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 18:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9974</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is a list of downtime in 2007 for 20 of the Internet&#8217;s most viewed sites. The stats are provided by Royal Pingdom and they give us some sort of insight on how smooth web-services really are. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a list of downtime in 2007 for 20 of the Internet&#8217;s most viewed sites. The stats are provided by Royal Pingdom and they give us some sort of insight on how smooth web-services really are. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal Pingdom &#187; Yahoo Search website trouble</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9962</link>
		<dc:creator>Royal Pingdom &#187; Yahoo Search website trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9962</guid>
		<description>[...] We recently reported that Yahoo&#8217;s main website (www.yahoo.com) has had no downtime at all in 2007. The website appears to be rock solid, and has built up an impressive uptime streak. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We recently reported that Yahoo&#8217;s main website (www.yahoo.com) has had no downtime at all in 2007. The website appears to be rock solid, and has built up an impressive uptime streak. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal Pingdom &#187; ServePath using Pingdom uptime data</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9959</link>
		<dc:creator>Royal Pingdom &#187; ServePath using Pingdom uptime data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9959</guid>
		<description>[...] The list was taken from our April post with downtime numbers for the Alexa top 20 websites. We actually posted a new, updated list last Tuesday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The list was taken from our April post with downtime numbers for the Alexa top 20 websites. We actually posted a new, updated list last Tuesday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Buckley&#8230; &#187; Alexa downtime statistics, 2007</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Buckley&#8230; &#187; Alexa downtime statistics, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9925</guid>
		<description>[...] Alexa has released the latest 2007 downtime statistics for the web&#8217;s most popular sites. We all strive for maximum uptime, but it&#8217;s a slightly re-assuring to know that even the world leaders still can&#8217;t achieve 100% uptime all of the time. 99.999% is a realistic figure, mind. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alexa has released the latest 2007 downtime statistics for the web&#8217;s most popular sites. We all strive for maximum uptime, but it&#8217;s a slightly re-assuring to know that even the world leaders still can&#8217;t achieve 100% uptime all of the time. 99.999% is a realistic figure, mind. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aboutmoney.ru &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Google не справляется с нагрузками</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9817</link>
		<dc:creator>aboutmoney.ru &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Google не справляется с нагрузками</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9817</guid>
		<description>[...] Сервис Blogger, входящий в двадцатку самых посещаемых в Америке сайтов, больше всех остальных был недоступен, сообщает The Register. Основанием для статистики стал TOP-20 самых популярных в США сайтов по версии Alexa и мониторинг их активности, который регулярно ведет компания Pingdom. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Сервис Blogger, входящий в двадцатку самых посещаемых в Америке сайтов, больше всех остальных был недоступен, сообщает The Register. Основанием для статистики стал TOP-20 самых популярных в США сайтов по версии Alexa и мониторинг их активности, который регулярно ведет компания Pingdom. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i-eclectica.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogger and YouTube have worst downtimes</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9769</link>
		<dc:creator>i-eclectica.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogger and YouTube have worst downtimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9769</guid>
		<description>[...] While I am not sure how trustworthy Alexa ratings are, Pingdom (above is a copy from their site) and also The Register seem to take them seriously enough. And accordingly, two Google sites are the worst; maybe Google is building a war chest for upcoming legal fights instead of investing in infrastructure, or maybe they&#8217;ve become simply too greedy. Honourable mention has to go to Yahoo!   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While I am not sure how trustworthy Alexa ratings are, Pingdom (above is a copy from their site) and also The Register seem to take them seriously enough. And accordingly, two Google sites are the worst; maybe Google is building a war chest for upcoming legal fights instead of investing in infrastructure, or maybe they&#8217;ve become simply too greedy. Honourable mention has to go to Yahoo!   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheetudeep Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogsphere threatened by Google downtime</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9722</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheetudeep Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogsphere threatened by Google downtime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9722</guid>
		<description>[...] The detailed report of uptime and downtime is accessible through pingdom&#160;website. In the given below table you can see how much the websites’ downtime has increased since April 2. The downtime is measured through GIGRIB(Green is good, Red is Bad).&#160; Pingdom GIGRIB is a unique, distributed website monitoring service. GIGRIB users can add websites they want monitored, and in return their computers become a part of the GIGRIB monitoring network. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The detailed report of uptime and downtime is accessible through pingdom&nbsp;website. In the given below table you can see how much the websites’ downtime has increased since April 2. The downtime is measured through GIGRIB(Green is good, Red is Bad).&nbsp; Pingdom GIGRIB is a unique, distributed website monitoring service. GIGRIB users can add websites they want monitored, and in return their computers become a part of the GIGRIB monitoring network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Has No Downtime by Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2007/05/15/downtime-in-2007-for-the-20-most-popular-websites-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-9669</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Has No Downtime by Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 23:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=134#comment-9669</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an awesome popular website downtable table. Yahoo has 0 minutes in 2007, but Google&#8217;s blogger.com was down for 21 hours! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an awesome popular website downtable table. Yahoo has 0 minutes in 2007, but Google&#8217;s blogger.com was down for 21 hours! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

