<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social network downtime in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Ramblings and tech news from the Pingdom team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-421254</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-421254</guid>
		<description>Would be great to have the same report for 2009!
Any chance? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be great to have the same report for 2009!<br />
Any chance? <img src='http://royal.pingdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Dave</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-98878</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-98878</guid>
		<description>How about Tribe?  And some of the others?  

The thing is, people look at these lists, and see only big-name companies.  Small companies, like fubar.com, of which I had never before heard, do not, then, get a chance to grow.  This is too bad.  

Why use a small site?  Less garbage!  I visited a few MySpace pages which came up in Google searches.  They were slow to load, slowed My computer, and were, generally, incomprehensible.  No MySpace for Me!  

Small sites need more exposure.  Especially when they are better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Tribe?  And some of the others?  </p>
<p>The thing is, people look at these lists, and see only big-name companies.  Small companies, like fubar.com, of which I had never before heard, do not, then, get a chance to grow.  This is too bad.  </p>
<p>Why use a small site?  Less garbage!  I visited a few MySpace pages which came up in Google searches.  They were slow to load, slowed My computer, and were, generally, incomprehensible.  No MySpace for Me!  </p>
<p>Small sites need more exposure.  Especially when they are better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dunn</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-89629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-89629</guid>
		<description>Ditto to Miles.  I give props to LJ for its stability after so many years and having seen it in early stages where no one expected to see it go down like it had.  Still leads the pack for a content based social networking service (as opposed to FB/MS which drown their users with not only ads but pointless bits of communicative drivel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to Miles.  I give props to LJ for its stability after so many years and having seen it in early stages where no one expected to see it go down like it had.  Still leads the pack for a content based social networking service (as opposed to FB/MS which drown their users with not only ads but pointless bits of communicative drivel).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Attacca</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-89489</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Attacca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-89489</guid>
		<description>The downtime ratings fail to take into account what&#039;s basically &quot;live downtime,&quot; the prime example being MySpace, where roughly 10% of my clicks to internal pages result in pages that say &quot;Server too busy&quot; or &quot;an unexpected error has occurred.&quot; If you ask me, their ranking would be absolutely abhorrent if those important factors were taken into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The downtime ratings fail to take into account what&#8217;s basically &#8220;live downtime,&#8221; the prime example being MySpace, where roughly 10% of my clicks to internal pages result in pages that say &#8220;Server too busy&#8221; or &#8220;an unexpected error has occurred.&#8221; If you ask me, their ranking would be absolutely abhorrent if those important factors were taken into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-89280</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-89280</guid>
		<description>I bet LinkedIn&#039;s numbers are way off after this week.

K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet LinkedIn&#8217;s numbers are way off after this week.</p>
<p>K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Maloney &#187; Breaking radio silence for an important announcement</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-89091</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Maloney &#187; Breaking radio silence for an important announcement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-89091</guid>
		<description>[...] But wait, kids, they&#8217;ve saved the best for last:  Just In Case You Need A Little Convincing&#8230; Here&#8217;s just one reason, out of many, we think LiveJournal deserves your vote. So far in 2008, LiveJournal has had less downtime than MySpace, Friendster, Facebook and LinkedIn. In fact, with only ten minutes of downtime, LiveJournal has had a full 12 hours and 18 minutes less downtime than Bebo. See the pingdom post for the complete list of social networks and their downtime. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But wait, kids, they&#8217;ve saved the best for last:  Just In Case You Need A Little Convincing&#8230; Here&#8217;s just one reason, out of many, we think LiveJournal deserves your vote. So far in 2008, LiveJournal has had less downtime than MySpace, Friendster, Facebook and LinkedIn. In fact, with only ten minutes of downtime, LiveJournal has had a full 12 hours and 18 minutes less downtime than Bebo. See the pingdom post for the complete list of social networks and their downtime. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; How Much Have Social Network Servers Failed in 2008 &#160; TechCrunchies - Internet Statistics, Numbers and figures</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-88394</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; How Much Have Social Network Servers Failed in 2008 &#160; TechCrunchies - Internet Statistics, Numbers and figures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-88394</guid>
		<description>[...] It has only been two months into the new year. An early peek into the server downtimes at the various social networking websites: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It has only been two months into the new year. An early peek into the server downtimes at the various social networking websites: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Digest of the Social Networking Space: Feb 27, 2008</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-87398</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Digest of the Social Networking Space: Feb 27, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-87398</guid>
		<description>[...] Downtime: Bebo has over 12 hours downtime in two months This is downright embarrassing. 12 hours is barely acceptable in a whole year, let alone Jan-Feb of this year. Other culprits include Microsoft live spaces, Friendster then Hi5. Let&#8217;s hope downtime reduces for the rest of the year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Downtime: Bebo has over 12 hours downtime in two months This is downright embarrassing. 12 hours is barely acceptable in a whole year, let alone Jan-Feb of this year. Other culprits include Microsoft live spaces, Friendster then Hi5. Let&#8217;s hope downtime reduces for the rest of the year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking Uptime by Elliott C. Back</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-87191</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking Uptime by Elliott C. Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-87191</guid>
		<description>[...] My favorite blog in the world has a post about the year to date downtime of various social networks which is revealing. Not a single one achieves the famous &#8220;three nines&#8221; uptime SLA (although Amazon&#8217;s S3 service offers a two nines 99.99% uptime guarantee). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My favorite blog in the world has a post about the year to date downtime of various social networks which is revealing. Not a single one achieves the famous &#8220;three nines&#8221; uptime SLA (although Amazon&#8217;s S3 service offers a two nines 99.99% uptime guarantee). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .: GAFNO.com - Hot World News Blog :. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Survey: Bebo has worst downtime out of major social networks</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/02/26/social-network-downtime-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-87107</link>
		<dc:creator>.: GAFNO.com - Hot World News Blog :. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Survey: Bebo has worst downtime out of major social networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=253#comment-87107</guid>
		<description>[...] Representatives from Pingdom, a performance monitoring software company, posted a blog entry on Tuesday with the results of a study that monitored how much downtime 14 major social networks experienced between Jan. 1 and Feb. 25. Bebo, which is most popular in the U.K. and Ireland, clocked in a total of 12 hours and 28 minutes of downtime. In second place was Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live Spaces, with seven hours and 25 minutes of downtime recorded, and Friendster came in third with six hours even. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Representatives from Pingdom, a performance monitoring software company, posted a blog entry on Tuesday with the results of a study that monitored how much downtime 14 major social networks experienced between Jan. 1 and Feb. 25. Bebo, which is most popular in the U.K. and Ireland, clocked in a total of 12 hours and 28 minutes of downtime. In second place was Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live Spaces, with seven hours and 25 minutes of downtime recorded, and Friendster came in third with six hours even. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

