Pingdom Home

US + international: +1-212-796-6890

SE + international: +46-21-480-0920

Business hours 3 am-11:30 am EST (Mon-Fri).

Pingdom Blog

Royal Pingdom

Ramblings from the Pingdom team about the Internet and web tech

RSS Feed

Web hosting a downward trend?

We noticed an interesting thing the other day while doing some research with Google Trends. The number of searches in Google for the term “web hosting” has decreased a lot in the last four years.

080630-hosting-search

Compared to the high points in 2004, there only seems to be ¼ as many searches for web hosting in 2008. Is the general interest for web hosting decreasing, even though the web as a whole is growing? It should be pointed out that the search term “hosting” shows the same downward curve.

We couldn’t help but discuss this graph here in the Pingdom office. Many of us have a past in the web hosting industry, and of course we work with web hosting companies every day because of our uptime monitoring service, so we are highly interested in the industry.

Some possible reasons for this downward trend could be:

  • The web hosting market is getting increasingly saturated.
  • Terminology is changing, so people are searching for other things. (But in that case what?)
  • People interested in web hosting are increasingly using other avenues than Google to find information. (For example web hosting forums and social networks.)

These are just theories. Truth be told, we really don’t know.

What do you think?

Want to test your site every minute?








You will get an email with your login information.

25 Comments

People could be more accustomed to searching blogs and getting recommendations off people. The web hosting market is very full at the moment and host of the hosts are probably not that good. As a result people are working off word of mouth.

Another hypothesis : people searching for “web hosting” include non-professional. A few years ago, if you wanted a personnal web site you had to make it yourself and to find a host. Nowadays, a lot of people will choose a blogging platform (Blogger, Typepad…). And you have other ways to express yourself, as MySpace (widely used by music bands).
So, maybe people are less searching for “web hosting” as they do not need it as much ?
Professionals still need it, and some individuals too.

Perhaps it’s getting specialized, and thus “Terminology is changing, so people are searching for other things.” For example, PHP hosting, rails hosting, .net hosting, etc.

I think that webhosting is used by two main camps of people: developers who want to build applications and amateurs who want to build homepages for themselves or for specific events (with calendars, pictures, videos, etc.). Developers know what “webhosting” is and would not need to Google it very much. The amatueurs, who would have been the ones Googling “webhosting” whenever they wanted to create a website, don’t need webhosts anymore. Historically, if you wanted to post media to the web or interact with people -> you setup your own website. But now social networking provides so much of that functionality for people, that less and less amateurs are creating their own sites. Why write a bunch of bad html and manually post pictures when you can use Flickr instantly, for free. Why post a calendar for your sports team when you can use Google Docs? Why build a website for your garage band when you can use MySpace? Individuals used to create their own homepages and now they’re creating social networking profiles. These amateurs, in my mind, were the people who didn’t really know what “webhosting” was and would have been responsible for most of the Google searches. Now, instead of signing up for webhosting they just login to Facebook. Webhosts are mostly selling their services to app developers who want to create the latest, greatest web application, make money off AdSense, or build sites for other people.

My full thoughts here:

http://hightechweekly.com/webhosting_vs_social_networking

I was thinking the same idea as Hans, but it didn’t seem like the phrases I entered fared any better. Keith does present an interesting case and I can see where some of the demand is met by other products or services. Personally, I wouldn’t use the phrase “web hosting” as its generic.

Obviously this is totally unscientific, but the comparison graph of “web hosting” versus “blogger” is practically a mirror image:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=web+hosting%2C+blogger&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

If you threw in other blogging/content services (maybe “wordpress” or “tumblr”) that might explain where all those web hosting people went.

one simple answer: web hosting is now a commodity.

4 years ago, it was still marginal. now the Internet is flooded with companies doing hosting. even Google and Amazon are doing it, which would have been unthinkable 4 years ago. we now have free web hosting (Google sites), to unlimited cheap plans (dreamhost), to specialized hosting (Amazon, GAE, rackspace)

I second what Keith said. Typical end-user will choose what’s easiest. Social media now lets them share/publish with little to no pain, while coding Frontpage (remember those days) was always complicated (is it still?)

Frankly, even though I provide web building services, I can see myself using non-web-hosting space for some of my stuff (ok, I do prefer my servers).

Searching for web hosting results in a lot of spam sites that cannot be trusted. I do think people are relying on word of mouth, going where their friends go, and searching in forums.

When the web was “new” everyone wanted hosting because that’s what you needed to have a presence on the internet. Learning HTML and making your home page (complete with under construction jpgs and spinning skull gifs) was the thing that everybody did. Free hosting from Geocities and Lycos helped a great deal with that.

Nowadays, social networking sites such as Myspace and blogging sites allow someone to have that same presence and when, combined with all the social networking features and the ease in which you can personalise your profiles what need is there for the average person to have their own website ?

Interesting observation. If the typical user goes to YouTube, Facebook, Flickr etc for their hosting needs what do all the webmasters do? Do they also choose such options, even if maybe a bit more technical, such as Google App Engine and S3? I wonder what the web hosting business will look like in 5 years, if there is really any significant business left to be had when web hosting becomes an almost free commodity.

Sekhar Ravinutala

July 1st, 2008 at 11:19 am


@Andreas – look for clouds. Better reliability, scalability, performance – seems like a logical transition to me. I myself just switched from PowWeb to Google App Engine.

This is the case of a conclusion based on false assumptions.

The downward sloping graph is not unique to web hosting.. try other search phrases and you will see the same downward sloping trend. Examples: tropical fish, mountain biking, car paint.. etc.

The cause is not clear. Are people using more specific searches? The downward trend seems to be fore more obscure “longtail” search terms. Maybe google changed their algorithm in some way that affects more obscure results? Or maybe people are spending more time on major sites and less time searching for anything. Plus there are more people online than in 2004 and that is somehow affecting the results.

Google trends is useless for single search phrases. It is only useful for comparing several of them. “web hosting, rails hosting” instead of “wen hosting”.

Not just the web hosting but the term free web hosting is also showing down ward trend.

I agree that more and more people are blogging, using the social network sites instead of purchasing web space.

Yes, u right tom. We using also this blog here to cominicate together!

http://www.can-bil.com
http://www.online-shopp.net

I think web hosting is still in high demand and it will go up as people look for a way to make some extra cash. You can get high quality web hosting cheap no matter what it is for a web site or blog.

From the Google Trends help page “Google Trends analyzes a portion of Google web searches to compute how many searches have been done for the terms you enter, relative to the total number of searches done on Google over time”

The graph doesn’t actually represent a decrease in the number of searches for “web hosting”, in spite of the downward slope there could actually have been an increase in the number of such searches. What the graph is actually depicting is a decline of the search term “web hosting” in the percentage of total searches for all terms. The only thing we can know for sure from this data is that people are searching for an ever-increasingly diverse range of terms. This is most likely explained by the fact that new users are going online ever day, and demographics are changing, and total search volume is increasing.

Basically if there were just 2 searches, one for “web hosting” and the other for “widgets”, then each term would chart very high as they would each represent 50% of total searches. Add in a search for “grommets”, and all terms drop to 33.3%.

In my opinion now more people are relying on forums and blogs for the related information.

Hi,

Just found your blog on Technorati & Digg upcomming news feeds and read a few of your other posts.
ISeems good contents,Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.

Thanks,
Michael

Probably a bit late to chime in on this conversation but I believe this trend was due to people getting more sophisticated search patterns – these days (2 years on from this post) using 5 and 6 word combinations with geolocaters are much more common! Also in my business Voucher codes people will use those terms

so maybe people now are searching for

vps uptime “promo code” site:.co.uk

In 2010, there were just over 1 million secure Internet websites worldwide. Almost half of those, or 446,992 to be exact, were located in the United States.

But in which country can we find the most secure websites in relation to population? The answer may surprise you.

Read more

No news is good news for the Super Bowl website

The New England Patriots held what seemed to be a commanding lead (17-15) with five minutes left of Super Bowl XLVI last night. But the New York Giants came back and managed to win with 21-17.

As exciting as the game sounds, we missed the whole thing, instead spending our time watching the Superbowl.com website.

It turned out to be a rather dull thing to do because the site held up well and there was no downtime at all. The response time also didn’t give away anything significant in terms of online Super Bowl traffic.

Read more

As Super Bowl 46 is approaching, fans will flock to the Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana, and to TV sets around the world to follow the New York Giants battle it out with the New England Patriots.

Kickoff is scheduled for 6:30EST on Sunday, February 5, and we’re already monitoring Superbowl.com to see how the site will handle the event.

What team will win Super Bowl 46? How will the site cope? We can only wait to find out.

Read more

Weekend must-read articles #2

Every Friday we bring you a collection of links to places on the web that we find particularly newsworthy, interesting, entertaining, and topical. We try to focus on some particular area or topic each week, but in general we will cover Internet, web development, networking, performance, and other geeky topics.h

This week we bring you a collection of articles focusing on cloud, with a few other topics thrown in to boot.

Read more

Out of the 59 US-based e-commerce sites we monitored during the holiday season last year 28 scored a perfect 100% uptime for December.

Whether this helped spur on the booming sales in the US, we don’t know, but retail e-commerce spending in the US reached $37.2 billion for the November to December 2011 period. That was an increase of 15% from the same period in 2010.

We decided to dig into the numbers for these e-commerce sites to see how well they did in terms of uptime and performance. After massaging the data coming from our Pingdom probes, it turns out that the sites overall performed well during December 2011 in terms of uptime, but response time was an issue for several sites.

Read more