<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One single web host was behind 75% of all email spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/13/one-single-web-host-was-behind-75-of-all-email-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/13/one-single-web-host-was-behind-75-of-all-email-spam/</link>
	<description>Ramblings and tech news from the Pingdom team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogmarks pour le 17/11/2008 » Glagla Dot Org - Le blog sans prétentions d’Olivier Mansour</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/13/one-single-web-host-was-behind-75-of-all-email-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-305572</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogmarks pour le 17/11/2008 » Glagla Dot Org - Le blog sans prétentions d’Olivier Mansour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1038#comment-305572</guid>
		<description>[...] Royal Pingdom » One single web host was behind 75% of all email spam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Royal Pingdom » One single web host was behind 75% of all email spam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Paolino</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/13/one-single-web-host-was-behind-75-of-all-email-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-305152</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Paolino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1038#comment-305152</guid>
		<description>Here is an article about &quot;How to Build a Botnet&quot; to try to understand how they could be destroyed.
http://blog.maysoft.org/blog.nsf/d6plinks/FPAO-7LDK5M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an article about &#8220;How to Build a Botnet&#8221; to try to understand how they could be destroyed.<br />
<a href="http://blog.maysoft.org/blog.nsf/d6plinks/FPAO-7LDK5M" rel="nofollow">http://blog.maysoft.org/blog.nsf/d6plinks/FPAO-7LDK5M</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iWeb Blog &#187; Links and News for this Week</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/13/one-single-web-host-was-behind-75-of-all-email-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-304963</link>
		<dc:creator>iWeb Blog &#187; Links and News for this Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1038#comment-304963</guid>
		<description>[...] a web hosting firm, was taken down in California yesterday morning, and traffic for email spam has reportedly decreased 75%. If you have any questions, iWeb is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a web hosting firm, was taken down in California yesterday morning, and traffic for email spam has reportedly decreased 75%. If you have any questions, iWeb is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Paolino</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/13/one-single-web-host-was-behind-75-of-all-email-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-304962</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Paolino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1038#comment-304962</guid>
		<description>What happens now that this botnets has no controlling source? Maybe they have a &quot;default&quot; malicious action if they cannot &quot;phone home&quot; for x days? Is a rogue botnet dangerous? 

http://blog.maysoft.org/blog.nsf/d6plinks/FPAO-7LCJSG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens now that this botnets has no controlling source? Maybe they have a &#8220;default&#8221; malicious action if they cannot &#8220;phone home&#8221; for x days? Is a rogue botnet dangerous? </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.maysoft.org/blog.nsf/d6plinks/FPAO-7LCJSG" rel="nofollow">http://blog.maysoft.org/blog.nsf/d6plinks/FPAO-7LCJSG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

