<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft&#8217;s homepage uptime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/</link>
	<description>News from Pingdom Uptime Monitoring</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:04:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linux and Mac Servers Have Less Downtime &#124; Webmaster-Source</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-307834</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux and Mac Servers Have Less Downtime &#124; Webmaster-Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-307834</guid>
		<description>[...] recent study conducted by Pingdom shows that Linux and Mac servers have a lot less downtime than those running a Microsoft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent study conducted by Pingdom shows that Linux and Mac servers have a lot less downtime than those running a Microsoft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pingdom</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-307259</link>
		<dc:creator>Pingdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-307259</guid>
		<description>@Colonelcrayon: We never said that this is a reflection of the operating systems. This is a survey about websites, nothing else, and we&#039;re not saying that you should choose your OS based on how its website performs.

@Todd: You don&#039;t think it&#039;s relevant to know how a website performs and is managed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Colonelcrayon: We never said that this is a reflection of the operating systems. This is a survey about websites, nothing else, and we&#8217;re not saying that you should choose your OS based on how its website performs.</p>
<p>@Todd: You don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s relevant to know how a website performs and is managed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOdd</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-307197</link>
		<dc:creator>TOdd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-307197</guid>
		<description>What does their webpage up-time and load time have to do with...Anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does their webpage up-time and load time have to do with&#8230;Anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b0mmer</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-307090</link>
		<dc:creator>b0mmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-307090</guid>
		<description>On the contrary to what was last said... I think that the uptime of the homepage tells the user alot about the kind of support available for the OS and also how much effort they put into their product.

Say you were going to choose a linux distro... Would you go with the company that releases no updates and their site is down 90% of the time (possibly the reason for the lack of updates)? or the one with no (or the least amount of) downtime?

Also looking at this from the perspective of the general public. What does the uptime and load time of the website tell people?
It could say that this company really doesn&#039;t put in the time and effort to make something worthwhile. Why should I buy something from a company that doesn&#039;t even take the time to keep their website functioning properly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary to what was last said&#8230; I think that the uptime of the homepage tells the user alot about the kind of support available for the OS and also how much effort they put into their product.</p>
<p>Say you were going to choose a linux distro&#8230; Would you go with the company that releases no updates and their site is down 90% of the time (possibly the reason for the lack of updates)? or the one with no (or the least amount of) downtime?</p>
<p>Also looking at this from the perspective of the general public. What does the uptime and load time of the website tell people?<br />
It could say that this company really doesn&#8217;t put in the time and effort to make something worthwhile. Why should I buy something from a company that doesn&#8217;t even take the time to keep their website functioning properly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geloraworld //. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linux vs Microsoft vs Apple</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-307040</link>
		<dc:creator>geloraworld //. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linux vs Microsoft vs Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-307040</guid>
		<description>[...] 16 Linux Distros homepage vs Apple homepage vs Microsoft homepage  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 16 Linux Distros homepage vs Apple homepage vs Microsoft homepage  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analisis del rendimiento de las Webs de 16 distribuciones Linux &#171; Jvare Blog</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-306523</link>
		<dc:creator>Analisis del rendimiento de las Webs de 16 distribuciones Linux &#171; Jvare Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-306523</guid>
		<description>[...] Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft’s homepage uptime [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft’s homepage uptime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (2008-11-19) Fedora 基础设施(Infrastructure)小组取得骄人成绩 &#124; Fuzzy! News - Fedora 新闻 &#124; FZUG</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-306463</link>
		<dc:creator>(2008-11-19) Fedora 基础设施(Infrastructure)小组取得骄人成绩 &#124; Fuzzy! News - Fedora 新闻 &#124; FZUG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-306463</guid>
		<description>[...] 原文见 Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft’s homepage uptime [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 原文见 Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft’s homepage uptime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HalfLoaded.com » Re: Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft’s homepage uptime</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-306215</link>
		<dc:creator>HalfLoaded.com » Re: Linux distros and Apple beat Microsoft’s homepage uptime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-306215</guid>
		<description>[...] really interesting post was placed on the Royal Pingdom blog that compared average load time and up time of operating system websites. The author took [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really interesting post was placed on the Royal Pingdom blog that compared average load time and up time of operating system websites. The author took [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apple, Linux, linux-distributions, load time, microsoft, uptime, web site monitoring, web site monitoring service &#124; Nocser Hosting Since 2002</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-306210</link>
		<dc:creator>apple, Linux, linux-distributions, load time, microsoft, uptime, web site monitoring, web site monitoring service &#124; Nocser Hosting Since 2002</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-306210</guid>
		<description>[...] 16 Linux Distros homepage vs Apple homepage vs Microsoft homepage  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 16 Linux Distros homepage vs Apple homepage vs Microsoft homepage  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colonelcrayon</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/11/19/linux-distros-and-apple-beat-microsofts-homepage-uptime/comment-page-1/#comment-306203</link>
		<dc:creator>colonelcrayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=1117#comment-306203</guid>
		<description>This is one of the least valuable articles I&#039;ve ever read.  Homepage uptime has absolutely nothing to do with the stability of the OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the least valuable articles I&#8217;ve ever read.  Homepage uptime has absolutely nothing to do with the stability of the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
