Pingdom Home

US + international: +1-212-796-6890

SE + international: +46-21-480-0920

Business hours 3 am-11:30 am EST (Mon-Fri).

Royal Pingdom

Gmail could be unavailable for more than 21 hours in a day, and Google could still tell you that according to their SLA, the service has had 100% uptime.

It sounds impossible, but it’s a direct consequence of how Google has written its SLA for Google Apps (which includes Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar and more). We will explain this in detail further down, but let’s first look at what the SLA actually says.

What the Google Apps SLA says

Here are the key parts, quoted from the Google Apps SLA, emphasis added by us:

“Downtime Period” means, for a domain, a period of ten consecutive minutes of Downtime. Intermittent Downtime for a period of less than ten minutes will not be counted towards any Downtime Periods.

[...]

“Monthly Uptime Percentage” means total number of minutes in a calendar month minus the number of minutes of Downtime suffered from all Downtime Periods in a calendar month, divided by the total number of minutes in a calendar month.

So, “downtime periods” are what’s ultimately used for counting the uptime percentage for Google Apps, and these downtime periods ignore all downtime that lasts less than 10 minutes.

A worst-case scenario

Now back to our initial statement. How does the SLA make it possible to have more than 21 hours of downtime in a day and yet Google would call it 100% uptime?

Here is the problem: What if Google Apps was down for 9 minutes, up for 1 minute, down 9 minutes, etc. That would mean 54 minutes of downtime each hour, but Google still wouldn’t count it because none of the individual downtimes lasted 10 minutes of more.

Over a day (24 hours), that’s 21 hours and 36 minutes of downtime that Google would simply ignore when calculating the final uptime percentage.


Above: Red is downtime, green is uptime. Note that none of the downtime periods above last 10 minutes or more and thus are not counted according to the Google Apps SLA.

It’s an extreme and very unlikely worst-case scenario, but we wanted to illustrate the consequence of how Google’s SLA sums up its downtime and calculates its uptime percentage.

A more likely scenario

Now let’s take a much more likely example of intermittent problems:

3m, 8m, 12m, 5m, 9m, 14m, 4m = 57 minutes of actual downtime

But Google would only count this as 26 minutes of downtime, including only the downtime periods lasting 12 and 14 minutes.


Above: In this scenario, only the downtime periods lasting 12 and 14 minutes (marked with yellow) would be counted according to the Google Apps SLA.

Short outages are common in the real world

The problem with the Google Apps SLA is that short outages, less than 10 minutes in length, are actually very common in the real world.

As you may know, we here at Pingdom run an uptime monitoring service, and we know from our own experience (and a LOT of data from thousands of sites) that it’s much more common for sites to have multiple short intervals of downtime instead of a few long ones.

The 99.9% monthly uptime guarantee in the Google Apps SLA allows for 43 minutes of downtime in a 30-day month, but ignoring problems that last less than 10 minutes at a time will definitely make it much easier for Google to honor its SLA.

Want to test your site every minute?








You will get an email with your login information.

12 Comments

Actually it is even more interesting, if they monitor by the second, which I’m sure they do.

9 Mins and 59 seconds would not count as downtime, so you can have 9:59 mins down and 1 second up, which would give you basically about 2 minutes of uptime daily.

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated and not published in real time. All comments that are not related to the post will be removed.


15 fantastic firsts on the Internet

First!

Trailblazers, creatives and innovators have taken the Internet to where it is today and made it an essential part of our everyday lives. We have selected a number of interesting “firsts” from the history of the Internet (and the Web) for your reading pleasure.

Read more

Facebook, social media juggernaut (infographic)

FacebookFacebook has announced that it now has 400 million active users. Just one year ago Facebook had 150 million users, so 2009 was an incredible year for the social media giant.

There can be no doubt that Facebook is pretty much unstoppable at the moment, a real juggernaut. For some perspective on Facebook’s amazing growth, we have put together this infographic. We hope you’ll enjoy it!

Read more

New from Pingdom: Shareable uptime banners with graphs

Pingdom logoSometimes you want an easy way to share your Pingdom monitoring data with others. So far we’ve had public report pages that you can use, but now we’ve added one more sharing method that is very flexible and easy to use.

Enter our new “report banners”.

Read more

Why the iPad’s lack of multitasking is a GOOD thing

Apple iPad

Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock lately, you’ll know that last week Apple announced the iPad, its new tablet device. Reactions have been a mixed bag, and a storm of discussion has swept through the blogosphere about various features the iPad should or shouldn’t have had.

One of the main complaints so far has been the iPad’s lack of multitasking. (To be precise, multitasking is a bit of a misnomer here; the iPhone OS has multitasking. What people really mean is only allowing one app at a time to run.)

Read more

The 20 richest Americans in tech

Richest in ITThe tech industry is littered with billionaires. We all enjoy a good income, but some clearly have earned more than others. Much, much more. The question is, how much money do the really big names in tech actually have?

To find out, we went through the Forbes 400, a list of the wealthiest Americans, and filtered out the people who work within the tech field, or more specifically: IT.

So here they are, the 20 richest Americans in tech today.

Read more