CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) are becoming increasingly popular. The obvious benefit is that they can help websites to give end users a speedier web surfing experience, but there is also another very positive side effect for the entire Internet, and it will become more noticeable the more common CDNs become.

The positive side effect is this: More CDN usage means less load on the Internet backbone.

Why? It all comes down to how most CDNs work.

Accessing a website that has no CDN

A regular website, with no CDN, serves all of its content from one static location, no matter where the website visitor is coming from. So, for example, if a European web surfer is visiting a website hosted in the United States, all the website content will be transferred from the American web hosting company across the Atlantic to the European user, via multiple network hops in both the United States and Europe.

Now contrast this with a good CDN, which will have multiple locations spread out over the world. It will make sure that content is always served from the location that is closest to the web surfer.

Accessing a website that has a CDN

When for example the European web surfer we mentioned above accesses the same site, which now uses a CDN, he will download the website content from a location in Europe, perhaps even in his own country. The data will only have to travel a fraction of the distance, with fewer network hops.

In other words: A much smaller part of the Internet infrastructure will have to be involved in the user’s interaction with this specific website.

Above: This is a visualization of the example mentioned in this article. Note that a much smaller part of the network infrastructure is used when the CDN is involved.

There may still be some data that needs to be transferred over the entire distance. Many sites only use CDNs for static files (for example images), but it will still greatly ease the load on the Internet backbone.

We suspect that 10 years from now, most web hosting solutions will have some form of built-in CDN, and this will be a Good Thing for the Internet.

What do you think?

Further reading: If you’re interested in some additional insights about CDNs, you might like to check out an article from 2008: A look at Content Delivery Networks, or “how to serve lots of content really fast”

Have you ever wondered how much money Google, Microsoft, Apple, IBM, Yahoo, Amazon and other tech giants have in the bank? What kind of assets do they have, how much spending money do they have? The vague answer is, “a lot.” But if you want to find out exactly how much, read on.

Read more

Microsoft and open source, those are two things that traditionally don’t mix. Quite the opposite; the more hardcore members of the open source community tend to view Microsoft as just one step below Satan.

But while much of the open source community has little love for Microsoft, Microsoft is actually trying desperately to send some love back. The Redmond giant may have its own business reasons for doing so, of course, but that doesn’t change the fact that Microsoft is contributing to open source in more ways than most people are aware of.

Read more

What do Android, Visio, Flash, Hotmail, Google Analytics and Powerpoint all have in common? Can you guess?

The answer is: None of them were created by the companies who now own them. They were acquisitions.

These products have continued to develop at their new homes, but the seed of innovation that sparked an actual, new product came from the outside. The key word here is innovation.

Read more

We all know Google is huge and their wide range of services are bound to have a fair share of competitors, but you may be surprised just how wide-ranging Google considers its competition to be.

Here below we have included a quote from Google’s latest SEC filing with some very interesting information about what Google has to say about its competition.

Read more

Big sites and services like Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter and many others rely heavily on open source software to run their operations. Happily, this isn’t a one-way street. They are also giving back to the open source community, not just by contributing to existing projects, but sometimes by open sourcing their own internal projects, giving back something completely new.

And what these popular sites can contribute is often quite valuable. Since they tend to be very large, they run big operations and have been forced to create solutions for scalability and performance problems that most other sites simply don’t have to deal with.

Read more