Posted in
Main on June 2nd, 2009 by Pingdom

What is now the fastest supercomputer in Europe was recently unveiled at a research institute in Jülich, Germany. The computer, named Jugene, is capable of a massive one trillion computing operations per second.
Here are some facts about the Jugene supercomputer:
- Based on IBM’s Blue Gene/P architecture.
- Computing capacity: 1 petaflop/second.
- That equals the computing power of more than 50,000 PCs.
- 294,912 processor cores.
- Processor type: 32-bit PowerPC 450 at 850 MHz.
- 144 terabytes of RAM.
- Mounted in 72 racks.
- Network bandwidth: 5.1 gigabyte/second with a 160 nanosecond latency.
- Power input: 2.2 megawatts.
Wish we could get one of these for Pingdom. Couldn’t cost all that much, could it?
Packing those CPUs tightly together
Each of the Jugene’s 72 racks has 1024 compute nodes, where each node has 2 gigabyte of RAM (totaling 144 terabytes for the whole system). This is what the compute nodes look like and how they are packed together:

For those of you who really want to dive into the nitty-gritty tech specs regarding Jugene’s setup, here’s more info.
Installing Jugene
Looks like there was some cabling involved in the installation process. A LOT of it…


This is most definitely a bit more complicated than plugging in your home computer.

Source: The Jülich Supercomputing Centre.
Suggested further reading:
Ten of the coolest and most powerful supercomputers of all time
Want to test your site every minute?
Posted in
Main on March 12th, 2010 by Pingdom

Microsoft and open source, those are two things that traditionally don’t mix. Quite the opposite; the more hardcore members of the open source community tend to view Microsoft as just one step below Satan.
But while much of the open source community has little love for Microsoft, Microsoft is actually trying desperately to send some love back. The Redmond giant may have its own business reasons for doing so, of course, but that doesn’t change the fact that Microsoft is contributing to open source in more ways than most people are aware of.
Read more
Posted in
Main on March 10th, 2010 by Pingdom
What do Android, Visio, Flash, Hotmail, Google Analytics and Powerpoint all have in common? Can you guess?
The answer is: None of them were created by the companies who now own them. They were acquisitions.
These products have continued to develop at their new homes, but the seed of innovation that sparked an actual, new product came from the outside. The key word here is innovation.
Read more
Posted in
Main on March 5th, 2010 by Pingdom
We all know Google is huge and their wide range of services are bound to have a fair share of competitors, but you may be surprised just how wide-ranging Google considers its competition to be.
Here below we have included a quote from Google’s latest SEC filing with some very interesting information about what Google has to say about its competition.
Read more
Posted in
Main on March 4th, 2010 by Pingdom
Big sites and services like Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter and many others rely heavily on open source software to run their operations. Happily, this isn’t a one-way street. They are also giving back to the open source community, not just by contributing to existing projects, but sometimes by open sourcing their own internal projects, giving back something completely new.
And what these popular sites can contribute is often quite valuable. Since they tend to be very large, they run big operations and have been forced to create solutions for scalability and performance problems that most other sites simply don’t have to deal with.
Read more
Posted in
Main on March 2nd, 2010 by Pingdom
Think about the software you use day to day. Depending on your profession and interests, what you use will vary, but some applications tend to show up over and over again. Microsoft Word and Excel, Powerpoint, Photoshop, various web browsers like Internet Explorer and Firefox, Skype, iTunes, and so on.
When it comes to those widely used, highly established desktop applications, think about how long it’s been since they first saw the light of day. Many of them are practically ancient.
Read more
_ck_
June 2nd, 2009 at 8:32 am
65nm cpus. It’s a shame they didn’t wait a year and base it on 32nm or even just 45nm technology, the power use might have been near 50% and on that scale the savings would be massive.
Here are the cpu specs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POWER6
chris
June 2nd, 2009 at 12:13 pm
144 terabytes of RAM. Might be enough to run Vista without crashing
Glen Young
June 3rd, 2009 at 2:44 am
soo, when does this come available in PC World lol.
i would love a one of these lol
nowhere to put it though…
shame, look forward to seeing in PC World a guess lmao
i would be soo lucky eh ?
dohn joe
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:32 am
is it wrong if one feels high and a little turned on if told that the pics of towering tapered black boxes are actually of super computers?? and what if it gets stronger with more intimate pics, like pics of them getting installed and its private parts(compute nodes)??
sigh. anyways. let me imagine jugene’s I/O and control planes.
Prometheus
June 12th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Perhaps they used 65nm chips because of the market shifting towards the 45 and 35nm fields.
I’m sure when buying nearly 300,000 processors, older models (a year or two is old in the computer world, lol) run cheaper.
G. Lynn
June 12th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
But will it play Crysis?
wheelnut53
June 12th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
I can just imagine the heat from this thing
Cecil
June 12th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
There may be “better” chips now, but when it takes a year or two to research, design, and build, you use what is what is available, not what “might be”. Everything that “hits the street” is behind the technology curve. For example, look how many years for 64 bit systems were marketed after the 64 bit chip was available.
“Woulda, coulda, shoulda” doesn’t put product on the market. Putting a stake in the the ground and going from there does.
tekky
June 13th, 2009 at 4:10 am
but does it play crysis????
cpticeicle
June 13th, 2009 at 7:25 am
that thing must have a HUGE cooling system, i cant imagine how much a coolent infrastructure that large would cost…
AJ
June 13th, 2009 at 8:50 am
The CPUs are chosen for a reason, they are cheap. Bluegenes go for the many cheap (low power) processors rather than the high end, powerful ones. One big reason is that it is easier to cool. One of the other top machines uses the Cell BE processors, basically the same thing in PS3s, which is the opposite approach. It’s all pretty cool, visit the Top500 website to compare the systems. I got to use RPIs BlueGene/L, 16,000 processors, though I only got access to about 1200. They are fun to work on for sure.
It’s crazy how fast these things become obsolete especially when they take a year or so to build. RPI’s went from 7th fastest to 34th fastest computer in the world in 1 year.
And yes, it plays Crysis, better than you computer does.
Frank
June 13th, 2009 at 9:36 am
“Computing capacity: 1 petaflops/second”
so we have 1e15 floating-point-operations per (second * second)
[think up some integration math here]
that leads us to:
floating-point-operations(t) = 1e15 * seconds
in short: let this thing run as long as possible, you get 1e15 f.p.o. more per second
Frank
June 13th, 2009 at 9:37 am
oops, made a typo in line 5. it should read flops(t)
shukov
June 13th, 2009 at 9:49 am
Anyone know why the processors only run at 850 mhz? I thought we had chips that run 4 times as fast as that nowadays.
glorybe
June 13th, 2009 at 10:24 am
Looks like they need to send this union to Japan for miniaturization. I’d like mine to be no larger than a pack of smokes and the power and heat problems might need a tweek as well.
robb
June 13th, 2009 at 11:37 am
what kind of computing problem they’re trying to solve ?
btw gotta be one hell of an electric bill.
Steve
June 13th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
@Chris
Yeah I think so since Vista can run on 1 GB of RAM without crashing.
James
June 13th, 2009 at 8:14 pm
My alienware could outdo it.
what
June 14th, 2009 at 1:48 am
Why the hell would it want to play crysis?”>?
Kehool
June 14th, 2009 at 2:00 am
No gfx card means no Crysis :O
what a shame!
Fillmatic
June 14th, 2009 at 7:55 am
I’m sorry, but this has NOTHING on THE GIBSON.
phi-nix
June 14th, 2009 at 8:29 am
what the hell is it for???
judah
June 14th, 2009 at 11:30 am
Will it run on windows?
)
Heroix
June 14th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
WoW. That’s insane. What’s fastest of whole world and where is it hosted then?
John
June 14th, 2009 at 9:29 pm
This reminds me of photos of ENIAC which also took up a room. And now a tiny computer like a PICOTux has 150x as much processing power and is the size of an RJ45 connector. I can barely imagine what the next 50 years are going to bring.
youwishbud.
June 14th, 2009 at 10:13 pm
your all wierd. that thing is a waste of space.
owmama
June 14th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
omg, coolest thing ever, just the thought excites me
hayhayy
June 14th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
loves it! whens it coming to real world
?
hayhayy
June 14th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
woah, thats actual amazing..
i wish i could have it
Enlightenment
June 14th, 2009 at 10:25 pm
Hey fools, likely they started designing the boards a long time ago, thus is why the processor isn’t the very latest. Obviously this stuff is not off-the-shelf common motherboard crap you use at home.
ares
June 15th, 2009 at 5:47 am
Didn’t it occur to anybody that cluster having some 300K cores and the processing power of “more than 50 000″ PC’s is kinda shitty ?
Or phrased otherwise, that it has “kinda” high overhead ?
And that today it would be a lot more lucrative to use a bunch of disconnected nodes & properly distributed algorithms / data paths ?
Well, it might be some are unable / unwilling to do it properly, so they are probably the only ones to care.
But hey, the biggest & fastest mainframe is here, everyone just drop to your knees and worship this overpriced, energy hungry pile of shit.
sam
June 15th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
What problems do these computers solve. How are they used. Do they compute how many cars can travel on a bridge without falling in the water.
Stuart
June 16th, 2009 at 7:56 am
But does it play Doom?
Phil E. Drifter
June 16th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
phi-nix, June 14th, 2009 at 8:29 am “what the hell is it for???”
They sell time for it. Say NASA wants to run some CPU intensive takes, interstellar modeling or something, NASA would pay them to run tests for 2hr/2day/a week.
me
June 16th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
1,000 4870’s can do more processing than the 294,912 cores these guys are using.
But to be fair that is 800,000 stream processors.
JOhann
June 16th, 2009 at 7:29 pm
LOL! i want that. that way, it would only take HALF a century to open adobe acrobat pdf!
Guy
June 16th, 2009 at 9:43 pm
o i got one of those in my basement
Anon
June 17th, 2009 at 10:50 pm
I think its used to host some epic CS server.
Erik
June 18th, 2009 at 4:59 am
Neat, In 15 years I will be seeing one that is just as good but the size of my laptop for $6000 at bestbuy.
In 20 years I will have bought one just as good for $1000 and it will be like a pad of paper.
In 30 years I will have something twice as good implanted into my arm.
yoga for health
June 18th, 2009 at 11:19 am
Please send it to Asian countries as well
allen de rico
June 18th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
But it’s still not a MAC
Lee
June 18th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
If you want to impress me, pass the Turing test…
RedRightHand
June 18th, 2009 at 11:41 pm
You could download the internet. All of it.
googly
June 19th, 2009 at 12:25 am
…and Vista STILL runs slow on it!!
James
June 19th, 2009 at 12:27 am
@ares,
I’m no expert, but that kind of overhead is part of any supercomputer as far as I’m aware. The power and resources required to manage those nodes is required, whether or not it’s abstract or all in the same room.
Not to mention, the overhead of having separate sites is probably way higher than any ‘waste’ here.
ItsMeSnitches
June 19th, 2009 at 10:05 am
Does it come with the cup-holder in the front panel like my Acer???
Tomaz
June 19th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
I bet they’re kicking themselves they didn’t talk to you first _ck_.
I’m no expert but this probably took a little while to design and build, during which technology inevitably advances…
Gubbin
June 19th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
flops/second is redundant.
Erim
June 19th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
they use these computers in airports
steve
June 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Just to let you know its not petaflops/s it should just be petaFLOPS because FLOPS stands for floating operations per second. So the /s is actually incorrect
Pingdom
June 20th, 2009 at 5:14 pm
@Steve and those who commented on the “petaflops” thing: Thanks. Fixed it. It was a typo.
Robotech
June 21st, 2009 at 12:01 am
Wow, I have a dual 450mhz PowerPC supercomputer in my room. I’m using it as a night stand.
Pooh
June 21st, 2009 at 8:46 am
I just wet myself!
Paul
June 24th, 2009 at 6:47 pm
This thing will run the international planned economy and trade right?
arbiter
June 27th, 2009 at 10:34 pm
That machine is PowerPC, not x86, so it will run neither Vista nor Crysis automatically. That being said, the incredible power of the Jugene supercomputer might be enough to simulate an x86 machine running Vista and Crysis, but another OS would have to be underneath to run the VM. Of course, the GPU would have to be simulated as well. That would be an interesting test, to say the least.
chaochen
June 27th, 2009 at 11:16 pm
Oh please don’t tell me they use these for scientific calculations for real. They has these bullshit procedures and accounts and access request for systems like this but in reality the admins just code pr0n dvds on them.
What changed over the time that 10 years later only millionaires could afford personal toys like this, today you can put together a 16core lil power station for cheap costs and we should thank asia for that.
delo
June 28th, 2009 at 11:31 am
Stupid – I just read here a lot of nonsense…
Does it will play Crysis, does it will play Doom… does it run Windows?
Come on dudes, are you really that stupid? Do you really think they will play shitty games on it – wasting horrible expensive time? It is for high troughput computing projects, like the well known SETI-Project (http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/) for example, or for one of such projects like the world grid (http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/) have to offer.
And honestly what the hell do you want with such a cluster?
Diego Viola
June 28th, 2009 at 2:04 pm
Nice, and it runs Linux, the best OS in the world.
dmilith
June 29th, 2009 at 7:28 am
On what Linux distro it’s running on?
CharlF
June 30th, 2009 at 8:05 am
I think You CAN run Crysis on it, It doesnt a big Video Card, It can just cache everything through the normal ram.
No worries :-p
Honest Billy
July 1st, 2009 at 11:06 am
In answer to the distro question. It runs it’s own stripped down version of linux. After all it would a shame if kde crashed it.
O to all those pointing out how it could be better. You might want to read about in other sources as to why it is as it is. The hardware is configured for a certain class of experiments. Distributed computing will be better for some situations but not all programs can be broke up this way without huge overheads being introduced.
Microsoft Guy
August 1st, 2009 at 2:22 pm
Wow, great stuff! This is all very interesting. It seems like this computer must suck up thousands of kilowatts of power.
nathan
August 28th, 2009 at 2:12 am
wow….IBM server rules..
steven
August 29th, 2009 at 4:00 pm
i would like to play a game of chess against this machine.
David
August 31st, 2009 at 12:59 pm
What is the purpose of this super fast computer, It also seems like the ENIAC as someone said, but I think this doesn’t fit in the USS Enterprise to control telet ransportation, so keep working IBM it’s got to be smaller.
Cual es el proposito de esta super computadora, Tambien me parece como la ENIAC como alguien dijo antes, pero no creo que quepa en el USS Enterprise para controlar la teletransportación, asi que sigan trabajando Señores de IBM, tiene que ser mas Pequeña.
Oystein
September 22nd, 2009 at 1:07 am
The BlueGene (L and P) was actually upgraded a couple of times. Increased the speed 700 to 850 if remember correctly, and also double the ram from 500MB to 1GB and then to 2GB.
The cooling is actually just regular server room cooling. (Most other super computers need liquid cooling. Check out the Earth simulator…) The cpu speed was limited for cooling purposes.
The blueGene is not very good for applications like SETI@Home since SETI@HOME is embarrassingly parallel and requires no inter-processor communication during processing. BlueGene is designed with a very fast network that makes it more suitable for more complex applications.
Nick
January 12th, 2010 at 11:50 am
So we are back to the massive computers in huge rooms. We will be talking about this in the future just like we talk about the first computers from the past.