Posted in
Main on August 4th, 2009 by Pingdom
As you may know, PayPal suffered from downtime yesterday. Overall, the problems lasted approximately 4.5 hours before being fully resolved. Since a significant number of e-commerce sites and online services handle some or all of their transactions through PayPal, how much money did the PayPal outage end up costing its users?
According to eBay (which owns PayPal), about $2,000 in payments flow through PayPal’s systems every second. This means that PayPal processes about $7.2 million in payments every hour for its users.
On its official blog PayPal has stated that the service was completely down, globally, for about one hour. So the outage cost PayPal users at least around $7 million. But PayPal also admits that it took an additional 3.5 hours after that before the service was fully restored, something we also need to take into account.
This means that the outage and following service problems cost Paypal users somewhere between $7 million and $32 million in lost payments.
Exactly where the actual cost landed between those two extremes is hard to tell, but judging by the comments we have seen in blogs and on Twitter, the problems were significant even after the initial one-hour service outage.
Want to test your site every minute?
Posted in
Main on February 7th, 2012 by Pingdom

In 2010, there were just over 1 million secure Internet websites worldwide. Almost half of those, or 446,992 to be exact, were located in the United States.
But in which country can we find the most secure websites in relation to population? The answer may surprise you.
Read more
Posted in
Main on February 6th, 2012 by Pingdom
The New England Patriots held what seemed to be a commanding lead (17-15) with five minutes left of Super Bowl XLVI last night. But the New York Giants came back and managed to win with 21-17.
As exciting as the game sounds, we missed the whole thing, instead spending our time watching the Superbowl.com website.
It turned out to be a rather dull thing to do because the site held up well and there was no downtime at all. The response time also didn’t give away anything significant in terms of online Super Bowl traffic.
Read more
Posted in
Main on February 3rd, 2012 by Pingdom
As Super Bowl 46 is approaching, fans will flock to the Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana, and to TV sets around the world to follow the New York Giants battle it out with the New England Patriots.
Kickoff is scheduled for 6:30EST on Sunday, February 5, and we’re already monitoring Superbowl.com to see how the site will handle the event.
What team will win Super Bowl 46? How will the site cope? We can only wait to find out.
Read more
Posted in
Main on February 3rd, 2012 by Pingdom
Every Friday we bring you a collection of links to places on the web that we find particularly newsworthy, interesting, entertaining, and topical. We try to focus on some particular area or topic each week, but in general we will cover Internet, web development, networking, performance, and other geeky topics.h
This week we bring you a collection of articles focusing on cloud, with a few other topics thrown in to boot.
Read more
Posted in
Main on February 2nd, 2012 by Pingdom
Out of the 59 US-based e-commerce sites we monitored during the holiday season last year 28 scored a perfect 100% uptime for December.
Whether this helped spur on the booming sales in the US, we don’t know, but retail e-commerce spending in the US reached $37.2 billion for the November to December 2011 period. That was an increase of 15% from the same period in 2010.
We decided to dig into the numbers for these e-commerce sites to see how well they did in terms of uptime and performance. After massaging the data coming from our Pingdom probes, it turns out that the sites overall performed well during December 2011 in terms of uptime, but response time was an issue for several sites.
Read more
Zr40
August 4th, 2009 at 9:49 am
I don’t agree. You’re assuming that if you can’t pay, you won’t buy it at all. If I wanted to buy something and wouldn’t be able to, I’d try again next day.
redwall_hp
August 4th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
An excellent point, Zr40. All too often businesses fall into the RIAA-style trap of claiming “we’re not making this money (that we assume we should be making) right now, so we’re losing money, and it’s the fault of fill-in-the-blank.”
marrtins
August 4th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
I totally agree with Zr40 – you cannot count this as lost payments. One may just pay after few hours or even next day.
Nathan
August 4th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Yeh man I lost $25 yesterday…till they paid me this morning! WOOHOO IM RICH!
Tully
August 4th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
Yup. There will be a percentage lost for sure, however, the sales did not simply vanish. To use $7m-$35m, it should read something like “PayPal was unable to process between $7m and $35m in payments during the 4.5h it was down”. Also, with the source being eBay, if the transaction fails, the sale is not lost and were likely recovered within 24h.
Ross
August 5th, 2009 at 1:49 am
And I would disagree, because if I can’t buy through you via paypal I’ll surely go somewhere else that offers the same product through a different payment processor.
Pingdom
August 5th, 2009 at 9:11 am
As some of you have pointed out, some people who can’t finish a transaction will try again later, but let’s face it, a LOT of people will simply take their business elsewhere. That said, since there are so many unknown factors involved this was of course a simplified calculation. It’s just an estimate, based on the little data available.
Wiley
August 6th, 2009 at 7:49 am
PayPal has been under-investing in its platform in recent years. It is unstable and nearing capacity. But the company prefers to gobble up as much market share as possible rather than take time and capital to improve the quality of service and uptime. They continually tout that their site is secure and so is your data….big, big lie.