Pingdom Home

US + international: +1-212-796-6890

SE + international: +46-21-480-0920

Business hours 3 am-11:30 am EST (Mon-Fri).

Pingdom Blog

Royal Pingdom

Ramblings from the Pingdom team about the Internet and web tech

RSS Feed

Microsoft’s move to counter LAMP: WebsiteSpark

When small companies and startups look for development tools, they often look to the open source community to cut down costs. Given the choice to spend nothing on licensing for a LAMP configuration compared to thousands of dollars in Microsoft licensing fees, it doesn’t take an MBA to realize why Apache’s market share is 46.6% compared to 21.9% for Microsoft IIS. Those numbers might be about to change thanks to a new Microsoft seed program, WebsiteSpark.

WebsiteSpark follows on the heels of Redmond’s two previous popular seed programs, DreamSpark for full-time students and BizSpark for software companies. These programs plant the seeds of Microsoft development tools into their intended fields for no upfront costs. Once the students/programmers/developers sees the fruits of their work come through with Microsoft tools, the hope is that they will remain loyal customers.

How does the program work?

The WebsiteSpark program is open to all companies who:

  • Build websites or web applications for others
  • Have less than 10 employees

If you fit these criteria, then you need to visit the WebsiteSpark website to sign up. You will need a Windows Live ID to sign up. If you don’t have one, you can register for one on the sign up page.

Now comes the first tricky part. If you did not receive a referral code from a Microsoft event, you have two options. First, you can choose a network referral partner to act as a sponsor for you. The second option is to send for a referral code from Microsoft during the registration process. This can take a couple of days.

So once you have received your welcome email from Microsoft, you can start accessing the benefits.

What comes with it?

Now for the good stuff. When you are accepted into the program, you have access to the following:

  • 3 licenses of Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition
  • 1 license of Expression Studio 3 (this includes Expression Blend, Sketchflow, and Web)
  • 2 licenses of Expression Web 3
  • 4 processor licenses of Windows Web Server 2008 R2
  • 4 processor licenses of SQL Server 2008 Web Edition

Not only do you get this software, for no upfront costs, but you have access to Microsoft training hosted online and opportunities to promote your business and products to others in the program.

To make things easier on developers, Microsoft also includes the Web Platform Installer and the Windows Web Application Gallery to provide members with a repository of third-party applications and tools, some of which are free and open source.

The fine print

Now comes the fine print. Remember when I said there were no upfront costs? Well there aren’t. Microsoft offers this program for free during the first three years. Upon completion of the third year, the member is charged $100. Once the three years are over, there are two options that one can take. Either pay $999 per year to keep the program as is, or opt for a scaled-down version for $199 per year.

So there are strings, but that is why it is called a seed program. Microsoft hopes it will be able to showcase its products to a customer base that would most likely be looking towards free/open source products. Once these developers have built their products on Microsoft’s platform… well you do the math.

About the author:
Jeff Orloff is a technology writer and consultant. His work can be found at JeffreyOrloff.com and SequoiaMediaServices.com. His favorite project is the iLAND5 network built specifically for kids.

Want to test your site every minute?








You will get an email with your login information.

In 2010, there were just over 1 million secure Internet websites worldwide. Almost half of those, or 446,992 to be exact, were located in the United States.

But in which country can we find the most secure websites in relation to population? The answer may surprise you.

Read more

No news is good news for the Super Bowl website

The New England Patriots held what seemed to be a commanding lead (17-15) with five minutes left of Super Bowl XLVI last night. But the New York Giants came back and managed to win with 21-17.

As exciting as the game sounds, we missed the whole thing, instead spending our time watching the Superbowl.com website.

It turned out to be a rather dull thing to do because the site held up well and there was no downtime at all. The response time also didn’t give away anything significant in terms of online Super Bowl traffic.

Read more

As Super Bowl 46 is approaching, fans will flock to the Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana, and to TV sets around the world to follow the New York Giants battle it out with the New England Patriots.

Kickoff is scheduled for 6:30EST on Sunday, February 5, and we’re already monitoring Superbowl.com to see how the site will handle the event.

What team will win Super Bowl 46? How will the site cope? We can only wait to find out.

Read more

Weekend must-read articles #2

Every Friday we bring you a collection of links to places on the web that we find particularly newsworthy, interesting, entertaining, and topical. We try to focus on some particular area or topic each week, but in general we will cover Internet, web development, networking, performance, and other geeky topics.h

This week we bring you a collection of articles focusing on cloud, with a few other topics thrown in to boot.

Read more

Out of the 59 US-based e-commerce sites we monitored during the holiday season last year 28 scored a perfect 100% uptime for December.

Whether this helped spur on the booming sales in the US, we don’t know, but retail e-commerce spending in the US reached $37.2 billion for the November to December 2011 period. That was an increase of 15% from the same period in 2010.

We decided to dig into the numbers for these e-commerce sites to see how well they did in terms of uptime and performance. After massaging the data coming from our Pingdom probes, it turns out that the sites overall performed well during December 2011 in terms of uptime, but response time was an issue for several sites.

Read more