Pingdom Home

US + international: +1-212-796-6890

SE + international: +46-21-480-0920

Business hours 3 am-11:30 am EST (Mon-Fri).

Pingdom Blog

Royal Pingdom

Ramblings from the Pingdom team about the Internet and web tech

RSS Feed

Did you ever wonder how busy the servers of the world’s largest social networks are? It turns out it’s very hard work being popular, especially for the number one player.

According to data from Google, Facebook serves 260 billion page views per month. That’s more than six million page views per minute, or a staggering 37.4 trillion page views in a year. We can safely assume that Facebook’s web servers aren’t getting bored waiting around for work to do.

No wonder Facebook needs as many as 30,000 servers, and they probably keep adding more and more. After all, they’re still growing.

Not that the web servers of other social networks are on a picnic, although they’re on a totally different playing field. A few samples:

  • MySpace: 24 billion page views per month
  • Twitter: 4.4 billion page views per month
  • LinkedIn: 1.9 billion page views per month

If you ever had any doubts that Facebook is king of the hill, at least in terms of sheer site activity, have a look at the chart here below that we put together using data from Google Ad Planner. These are global numbers.

A few observations on scale:

  • Facebook has almost 11 times as many monthly page views as MySpace, which came up second, and 59 times as many as Twitter.
  • In turn, Twitter has more than twice as many monthly page views as LinkedIn.
  • Digg has twice as many monthly page views as Reddit and more than seven times as many as Slashdot.
  • Comparing the first and last on this list, Facebook has 5,778 times as many monthly page views as FriendFeed (which Facebook owns these days anyway).

There are of course plenty of other things that can keep servers busy other than serving web pages, for example streaming music or video, third-party data access via APIs (for example Twitter apps), etc.

Also, don’t get page views confused with actual visits or user numbers. Having more users makes it more likely that sites have many page views, but there are also other factors to consider, such the site design itself and the type of service it offers. Some sites encourage exploration more than others, clicking around to different pages. We’re going to have a closer look at this in a later post.

But for now, let’s just admire the incredible amount of work being done by these sites, every minute and hour of the day. Being popular in social media is hard work. :) No wonder people complain when social network sites have downtime, there are always a ton of people using them.

Note: As always when working with estimates (which Google and all other external data collection services do), there will be a margin of error in the numbers.

Want to test your site every minute?








You will get an email with your login information.

18 Comments

Duh! Myspace is so 2006 and most people access twitter via a client and not the web site.

Interesting numbers. I appreciated mentioning the 30,000 servers Facebook has – I hadn’t heard that before. Truly mind-boggling!

Facebook has 37.4 trillion page views in a year? Wow! Staggering indeed.

This graph shows to me that Twitter is still an infant. I am predicting that Twitter will continue to grow, perhaps faster than Facebook. I will not be surprised if Twitter surpasses hi5 in page views by year end.

It’s worth remembering that plenty of Twitter’s traffic is via 3rd party applications, whereas almost all Facebook traffic is on site.

Myspace is a bit dated and Twitter has to expand to compete

You might want to mention YouTube, averaging ONE BILLION views a day. Do the math, 30 days in the month, a billion views a day…..

I mention YouTube because YouTube IS a social network too. Run behind the scenes by Google Friend Connect, or so we believe. Not to mention YouTube is the #2 search engine, ahead of Yahoo or da Bing.

Kinda sheds a whole new light on what Google is really doing with Friend Connect, Google Wave and YouTube. Not to mention 40 other applications like Reader, Maps and Gmail all wired together into one big social network.

Kinda makes Facebook puny in comparison.

Also let’s do the math here.

260,000,000,000 page views per month.

Facebook claims 350,000,000 users.

That means in one month every Facebook user has to load 742 Facebook pages per month.

Divide that by 30 days in the month and you get EVERY Facebook user loading 24.7 pages per day.

Now let’s say 50% of Facebook profiles are inactive.

That is a real number for social media profiles.

Now the half that are active have to load 50 pages per day to make those numbers real.

If you are spending all your time loading 50 pages a day, how does anything on Facebook have time to convert into sales, newsletter opt ins or connections that bring in consulting, affiliate sales or services?

To me these numbers say the average Facebook user is too busy with Facebook to be of any worth to any business on Facebook.

These numbers show why we have seen a drop in Facebook conversions for our client’s sites.

This is also why Facebook users are not apt to leave the site, or convert into business relationships that some seem to think can come from Facebook profiles and fan pages.

Facebook users are too busy to hold a job and make any money to spend on anything else but rent and their Internet connection.

Or so these numbers tell us….

A short calculations tells me that this results in an average of 3.33 hits per server per second (100,000 hits / second and 30,000 servers). After an abitrary correction of let’s say 3 it
for peek times, to me it still seems that there’s something ‘wrong’ in the numbers mentioned above (too low). Am I missing something???

No news is good news for the Super Bowl website

The New England Patriots held what seemed to be a commanding lead (17-15) with five minutes left of Super Bowl XLVI last night. But the New York Giants came back and managed to win with 21-17.

As exciting as the game sounds, we missed the whole thing, instead spending our time watching the Superbowl.com website.

It turned out to be a rather dull thing to do because the site held up well and there was no downtime at all. The response time also didn’t give away anything significant in terms of online Super Bowl traffic.

Read more

As Super Bowl 46 is approaching, fans will flock to the Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana, and to TV sets around the world to follow the New York Giants battle it out with the New England Patriots.

Kickoff is scheduled for 6:30EST on Sunday, February 5, and we’re already monitoring Superbowl.com to see how the site will handle the event.

What team will win Super Bowl 46? How will the site cope? We can only wait to find out.

Read more

Weekend must-read articles #2

Every Friday we bring you a collection of links to places on the web that we find particularly newsworthy, interesting, entertaining, and topical. We try to focus on some particular area or topic each week, but in general we will cover Internet, web development, networking, performance, and other geeky topics.h

This week we bring you a collection of articles focusing on cloud, with a few other topics thrown in to boot.

Read more

Out of the 59 US-based e-commerce sites we monitored during the holiday season last year 28 scored a perfect 100% uptime for December.

Whether this helped spur on the booming sales in the US, we don’t know, but retail e-commerce spending in the US reached $37.2 billion for the November to December 2011 period. That was an increase of 15% from the same period in 2010.

We decided to dig into the numbers for these e-commerce sites to see how well they did in terms of uptime and performance. After massaging the data coming from our Pingdom probes, it turns out that the sites overall performed well during December 2011 in terms of uptime, but response time was an issue for several sites.

Read more

Pingdom Podcast #5

Pingdom’s Mobile Podcast is a weekly show about Internet, web, and mobile stuff.

In this show, Saleh also gives us an update on the pending submission of his Carbon for Windows Phone Twitter client. We’re also joined by Mario Lurig, who talks about using Amazon S3 and Cloudfront to speed up a website.

Read more