<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter is Digg&#8217;s biggest threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/</link>
	<description>Ramblings and tech news from the Pingdom team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing Musch</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-400424</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing Musch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=5267#comment-400424</guid>
		<description>I like digg but it needs a better and more self explanatory name like &#039;Topic Blitz&#039; or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like digg but it needs a better and more self explanatory name like &#8216;Topic Blitz&#8217; or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travel Blogs</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-399504</link>
		<dc:creator>Travel Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=5267#comment-399504</guid>
		<description>I actually like Digg, so hope it will pull through</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like Digg, so hope it will pull through</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-399406</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=5267#comment-399406</guid>
		<description>This is an astute observation and a more telling statement on the 2.0 personal network social scene. As this extends the blogspheres initial underscoring of flexing ones cyber reputation online, so to will the nature of what I like to coin microaggregation evolve as well. Even though I am a Digger from the beginning their compromises in adding sponsor content etc have tempered their standing with me and as you say it will eventually be supplanted by my own personal network of uber focused content. Where it will come from is still anyones guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an astute observation and a more telling statement on the 2.0 personal network social scene. As this extends the blogspheres initial underscoring of flexing ones cyber reputation online, so to will the nature of what I like to coin microaggregation evolve as well. Even though I am a Digger from the beginning their compromises in adding sponsor content etc have tempered their standing with me and as you say it will eventually be supplanted by my own personal network of uber focused content. Where it will come from is still anyones guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-399398</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=5267#comment-399398</guid>
		<description>@Bob Personally I would not say the same of stumbleupon.  Stumbleupon has a ton of spam on it in my opinion.  While twitter does too I believe the cream of the crop will rise to the top on twitter because people will vote with their follows. 

On sites like digg, stumbleupon, etc the people vote but a lot of it is blind voting.  I personally report about 10 spam articles on mixx.com every single day.

Social sites like digg still have their place on the net but twitter and facebook is where the action is at now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob Personally I would not say the same of stumbleupon.  Stumbleupon has a ton of spam on it in my opinion.  While twitter does too I believe the cream of the crop will rise to the top on twitter because people will vote with their follows. </p>
<p>On sites like digg, stumbleupon, etc the people vote but a lot of it is blind voting.  I personally report about 10 spam articles on mixx.com every single day.</p>
<p>Social sites like digg still have their place on the net but twitter and facebook is where the action is at now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarketingBit &#187; MBR3 – Best Online Marketing &#38; Social Media Articles for January 7th, 2010</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-399352</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketingBit &#187; MBR3 – Best Online Marketing &#38; Social Media Articles for January 7th, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=5267#comment-399352</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Twitter is Digg’s biggest threat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Twitter is Digg’s biggest threat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Nunn</title>
		<link>http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/07/why-twitter-is-diggs-biggest-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-399210</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Nunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=5267#comment-399210</guid>
		<description>Would you say the same of StumbleUpon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you say the same of StumbleUpon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

